News Feed

Sunday, 12 January 2014

Ready for take-off?

Meeting and capitalizing on the surge in demand for air travel to China presents a complex flight plan for international carriers


As demand for long-haul flights between China and the rest of the world continues to rise, international air carriers are grappling with how they can increase destinations beyond the country’s major transportation hubs.


Fueled by the migration of international businesses to cities beyond the big three — Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou — carriers are busy mapping out new routes to facilitate business and leisure travel.


“For a majority of the international carriers, if they want to expand in China, they will have to look beyond the standard places used in the past,” says Andrew Herdman, director-general of the Association of Asia-Pacific Airlines.


In the past two years, more than a dozen new routes to second- and third-tier cities have been introduced by the biggest international airlines.


Most recently, British Airways set up a service flying three times a week from London to Chengdu, capital of Southwest China’s Sichuan province, the first new route for the UK airline in China in seven years.


It plans on increasing the service to five times a week this summer, using one of the company’s new four Boeing Dreamliner aircrafts.


Qatar Airways also announced a new service to Chengdu in September, targeting the city that serves as one of the centers in the Chinese government’s go-west campaign, urging businesses to move from saturated coastal areas.


In June 2013, Finnair started a direct flight three times a week from Helsinki to Xi’an, capital of Shaanxi province and home to the Terracotta Warriors.


The nation’s oldest international air partner, Lufthansa, which first began flights to China in 1926, was again one of the first to seek out second-tier cities as destinations, establishing routes to Shenyang, capital of the northeastern province of Liaoning, and Qingdao in Shandong province, East China, as early as the summer of 2012.


“As a global airline, we want to grow with the market and we operate flights where we see a substantial demand and future potential. We constantly evaluate our network,” says Juerg Christen, Lufthansa’s managing director for Greater China.


The long list of new routes from international carriers in China marks a potential shift in how the market is perceived.


Historically, international carriers would connect with the major airports of a country and establish local partnerships to help carry passengers to less frequently visited destinations. “The lesson from history is to focus on particular points and serve them with regular frequency, establish good distribution, use alliance partnerships or code-shares with industry partners to build a feed to and from,” Herdman says.


But with China set to be one of the fastest growing markets in terms of passenger numbers, relying on local alliances may not be enough if international carriers want to tap into the country’s potential.


“The foreign carriers are taking a different view,” Herdman says. “They recognize they might not be able to get more slots in Beijing, Shanghai or Guangzhou, so they are becoming more tempted to put in direct services to cities such as Chengdu and others.”


Hesitating to call any city second-tier, Herdman says cities such as Chengdu, Qingdao and Chongqing are among the most populated on the globe.


According to the Airline Industry Forecast published by the International Air Travel Association in December, China’s passenger numbers are expected to jump by 227.4 million by 2017 on routes within or connected to China.


The report places China as the largest driver of growth, accounting for 24 percent of new passengers over the next three years.


Of the new passengers, 195 million are expected to be domestic travelers, with 32.4 million international.


International passenger volume within China is expected to continue thriving with a 7.1 percent compound annual growth rate.


The Middle East, with a healthy 6.3 percent compound annual growth rate, holds the strongest growth by region.


Connecting the two busiest regions, Qatar Airlines launched its new Hangzhou-Doha route last month.


“The fact that the Asia-Pacific region, led by China and the Middle East, will deliver the strongest growth over the forecast period is not surprising,” says Tony Tyler, director general and CEO of the International Air Travel Association. “Governments in both areas recognize the value of the connectivity provided by aviation to drive global trade and development.


“To reap the benefit, governments in those regions will need to change their view of aviation from a luxury cash cow to a utilitarian, powerful draft horse to pull the economy forward.”


But it’s not business travelers seeking opportunity in the untouched corners of the world’s second-largest economy who are calling for more international flights.


Increased interest in travel abroad from China’s prospering middle-class has the airlines deliberating over how to take advantage of this new generation of vacationers.


In 2012, the number of outbound travelers from China was more than 80 million, prompting several European tourist boards to launch campaigns to draw in Chinese tourist pounds and euros. The number hit 97 million last year. Most of these travelers were from cities outside Beijing and Shanghai. It is in the second-tier cities where the real swelling of numbers is taking place.


At the Zhengzhou international airport in the capital of Henan province, a city most recognized in the West as a production center for Apple products, growth in passenger rates is almost double the national average, hitting 13 percent in 2012.


“It is definitively an asset to have direct flights into second-tier cities with a strong demand. It makes our global network even stronger,” Christen of Lufthansa says. “It allows the passenger to fly directly to and from Europe without having to change aircraft.”


Despite an eagerness to explore the untapped potential of China’s more remote regions, many airlines are expressing caution about starting new routes.


Establishing a flight to a new city is a multi-million-dollar gamble. A standard route operating with a Boeing 767, which can carry 220 passengers, can cost an airline up to $50 million per year to operate, requiring more than 120,000 passengers per year to break even.


That price tag is slightly lower for international carriers traveling to second-tier cities, with many local governments offering subsidies to airlines to establish international routes to help bring investment and tourism to the city.


In 2012, more than 600 million yuan ($99 million) in subsidies were offered by 18 Chinese cities to airlines willing to establish international routes.


And while subsidies may offer a head start for a new flight path, when the funding stops, airlines are occasionally left with a tough decision — fold the flight or risk running into the red.


This was the choice Air France faced early last year. After running its Paris-Wuhan, Hubei province, route for two years, the carrier decided to reduce its frequency from three times a week to two, after considering canceling the flight altogether.


According to one French newspaper, Air France was being offered about 30,000 euros per flight by the local government to the capital of Central China’s Hubei province.


Although many airlines are eager to expand, China’s current air regulations and infrastructure are already feeling the strain. Beijing Capital International Airport, which opened its third terminal in 2008 for the Beijing Olympics, is the second-busiest airport in the world, handling 82 million passengers per year. The busiest, Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport in Atlanta, Georgia, sees 95 million passengers annually.


Shanghai Pudong and Hongqiao airports are not far behind, handling a combined 80 million passengers last year, according to reports from the Center for Asia-Pacific Aviation.


Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport expects to handle 52 million passengers this year, compared with just 20 million when the airport opened in 2004.


Combined, these three cities account for 31 percent of the total air traffic in China.


While airports and airlines generally welcome high passenger numbers, coordinating such traffic often comes with a host of problems, largely resulting in unexpected flight delays.


Chinese airports, despite being among the busiest in Asia, failed to take any of the top 10 spots in the 2013 On-time Airline and Airport Performance report, published by Flightstats, a travel tool that provides real-time flight information.


“What is disturbing are the delays on the ground, just before take off,” says Peter Jorna, president of the European Association for Aviation Psychology. “I know this for Shanghai where we often have to wait three hours in the aircraft, before starting a flight of 12 to 13 hours.


“Such long hours are not OK for both crew and passengers.”


Aiming to divert traffic away from such high-volume areas to alleviate pressure and avoid delay, China has seen several new airports built in second- and third-tier cities in the past decade.


Most recently, the southern city of Shenzhen completed work on an 8.5 billion yuan international terminal in November. Tripling the size of the airport’s other terminals, it saw a staggering 2 million passengers pass through its gates within the first month of operation.


Chengdu, which has seen the most new activity from international airlines, plans to build a new airport by 2017 that will double the current capacity of the present one.


Beijing will also see an additional $11.8 billion airport with seven runways built in the southern part of the city, due to be completed by 2018.


“China is investing in ground infrastructure,” says Zhang Baojian, regional vice-president of International Air Travel Association North Asia. “By 2015, China is expected to have more than 230 airports. This will ensure that there is sufficient capacity to accommodate the anticipated aviation growth.


“However, investing only in infrastructure on the ground will not be enough. By 2020, the anticipated traffic volume is expected to result in flight delays at Chinese airports if the airspace structure remains unchanged from today. This means flights will not be able to depart or arrive on time.”


The sheer speed of growth means that even as new airports are built, they are serving only to keep up with the current amount of passengers, Herdman of the Association of Asia-Pacific Airlines says.


“You can build airplanes and fly them but if the airspace management and airport capacity cannot keep pace, then you are going to get problems, and that’s felt by the traveling public in terms of delays and congestion,” he says.


“But even where there is an enthusiasm for building modern infrastructure, you can point to a number of cases where it hasn’t kept pace with demand.


“We’re talking about China, but there’s a similar case in the Philippines and Indonesia, where the rapid growth in demand for air travel, particularly domestic, has outstripped the runway and terminal capacity.”


Compounding congestion is China’s unique management of airspace. As is the case with the development of most commercial aviation zones worldwide, Chinese airspace began under military control. But unlike in other parts of the world, where airspace control was gradually ceded as the aviation industry grew, in China more than 80 percent of airspace still remains under the control of the military.


This places a limit on the amount of flights allowed to a certain location, even if the infrastructure is capable of supporting more. Limited airspace has led to strong competition among domestic and international airlines vying for slots at the major hubs. With a majority of the new passengers in China traveling domestically, when slots do become available at major hubs, they are often awarded to local carriers.


The tough competition with domestic carriers at the major city hubs has further prompted international carriers to look to routes where terminal spaces are more easily accessed and new markets can be created.


For US carriers, it’s not just airspace limiting the flow of flights between the US and China, says Robert Mann, CEO of R.W. Mann and Co Inc, a US-based aviation analysis and consulting firm.


He says the lack of bilateral agreements between China and the US have created a hesitation from US carriers about investing too much into expanding their China business.


“The primary issue for US airlines is a lack of open-skies agreements,” Mann says.


Aimed at removing government involvement in commercial air operations, the US has established open-skies agreements with more than 110 countries. That there are none with China is a hurdle for US airlines eyeing expansion.


Unhindered by bilateral agreements, European airlines are showing more enthusiasm for expanding their presence in China, with the majority of new routes to second-tier cities initiated by EU carriers.


US airlines have been pushed to use the more traditional means of access — encouraging partnerships with Chinese airlines. Since 2011, Delta has been using its local partnerships to begin offering direct flights from Beijing to the US. Previously, flights from Beijing stopped at Tokyo’s Narita International Airport before traveling on.


By TODD BALAZOVIC and WANG WEN ( China Daily )






China Daily via CHINA US Focus http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ChinaUsFocus/~3/YMKtkiMSrZg/

Sino-Japanese Ties in 2013 and the Role of the US

It has become customary in East Asian countries in recent years to hold a year-end poll to choose a Chinese character that best symbolizes the year on a certain theme. However, there has been no attempt so far to select an “annual Chinese character”, as it is called, for the China-Japan relationship. I would choose “dou” (literally struggle between adversaries contending for the upper hand) to encapsulate the bilateral relations in 2013.


“Dou” in 2013 was the continuation and escalation of “zheng”, or dispute, between China and Japan over the Diaoyu Islands in 2012. Instances of dou came in three categories in 2013. The first was the tussle over the territory in dispute. This is the biggest problem between China and Japan. The most glaring contradiction was Japan’s denial of the fact that dispute exists over Diaoyu and that the two countries had reached consensus for “shelving the dispute”. This obstinate attitude of the Japanese government constituted a denial of the possibility of settling the dispute through negotiation. China was also adamant, insisting that Japan must acknowledge the dispute. On September 14, a China Coast Guard fleet conducted its first patrol in waters near the Diaoyu Islands. On November 23, Chinese Defense Ministry announced the establishment of an Air Defense Identification Zone over East China Sea, which covers the Diaoyu Islands.


The second category of dou between China and Japan is the confrontation of the two countries’ security systems, which is especially evident in the fact that Tokyo explicitly listed China as its enemy. In November 2013, both China and Japan decided to establish their respective National Security Commissions. In the organizational setup of Japan’s national security conference, there are “Department of Allies and Friendly Nations” and “Department of Other Nations” but China is included in neither department. Instead, China is in a separate list together with the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, which Tokyo calls a “rogue country”. That manifests the Abe administration’s attitude towards China. On December 17, the Japanese government adopted the “Strategy for National Security in the Next 10 Years” and a new “Defense Program Outline”. International media commented that this largest military reform since World War II is aimed at confronting China.


The third type of dou came in the form of national emotions stirred up by historical problems. History has always been the Achilles’ heel of Japanese diplomacy. Former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi was once refused by the US Congress to deliver a scheduled speech at the Capitol Hill because of his denial of Japan’s aggressive past. After Shinzo Abe resumed premiership for the second term, Japanese politics accelerated its right-turn, nationalist drive. Tokyo adopted a dodging and even denying attitude on all issues concerning Japan’s aggressive history, such as the understanding of the aggressive nature of the wars Japan waged in World War II, the issue of comfort women, Japanese leaders’ visits to the Yasukuni shrine, the Potsdam Proclamation and the post-war Yalta international order. That aroused indignation and protests from the people of China, the Republic of Korea and other victim countries. They asked Japan to reflect on its wartime responsibility and no longer do anything to harm the feelings of the Chinese and other victim countries’ people. A media survey in 2013 conducted in China and Japan indicates that the Chinese public’s negative impression about Japan had reached a historical high.


The Sino-Japanese relationship has never been mired in such a predicament as it is today since the two countries normalized their diplomatic ties in 1972. Recently, European scholars and media likened today’s Asia to Europe of 100 years ago in their comments marking the 100th anniversary of World War I. Some of them said they seemed to have heard an “ominous echo” of history. With such an explosive confrontation, how to handle their bilateral relations proves to be a thorny problem for China and Japan. It is also a test for the United States, for the superpower on the other side of the Pacific Ocean has always been an influential and even decisive player in East Asian affairs. Uncle Sam must do something to prevent the Sino-Japanese dou from flaring up into military conflicts.


There are at least three things the US can do in 2014. First, review its rebalancing strategy and coordinate it with its China policy. After the end of the Cold War, regional order in East Asia remained to be a mixture of a hierarchical system and an anarchic system. The current territorial disputes in East and South China Seas are apparently between China and Japan, the Philippines and some other countries. But they will eventually end up causing troubles in the Sino-US relations, for those security-reliant countries such as Japan and the Philippines always try to push their security purveyor on stage from behind the scenes. When drafting the rebalancing strategy, Washington eyed more on the favorable side of the East Asian ally system. Now it needs to give some consideration to the unfavorable side and coordinate its East Asia security policy with its China policy. Of course, China also needs to coordinate its own East Asia security policy with that of the US.


Second, review the strategic basis of the Sino-US relationship. At present, that relationship has once again come to a stage of transition. The basis for the strategic cooperation is turning from the need to cope with a common threat to the need to create joint benefits. The top benefit is peace and stability in the Asia Pacific region. It is only with peace and stability that China and the US can share development and prosperity. Even in Japan, surveys have shown that what the Japanese people are concerned with most is the economy rather than security. An improved economy and a success in hosting the 2020 Tokyo Olympics in peace will bring more opening and confidence to Japan.


Third, the US can, as an ally, urge Japan to admit the islands dispute and push for negotiations between China and Japan for a soft landing of the dispute and military confrontation. The US is the most powerful country and the most energetic in promoting moral values. However, it has not played a constructive role on the Sino-Japanese dispute. On the one hand, it claims that it does not take sides on the Sino-Japanese territorial dispute; on the other, it supports Japan’s “right to exercise administration”. This ambiguous attitude may appear to be just an impassive third party’s aloofness for the time being, but in the long run it will most likely ruin Japan and involve itself in the trouble because of the wrong signal such ambiguity has conveyed. Beijing, Tokyo and Washington should all make efforts to avoid being dragged into a crisis or even a war by the islands dispute. And they all should work for better cooperation in Asia Pacific affairs. Whether they can realize these must-dos matters greatly to their future.


Jin Ying is a Research Associate at the Institute of Japanese Studies at CASS.






Jin Ying, Associate Researcher, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences via CHINA US Focus http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ChinaUsFocus/~3/aXkBW6yO5Jw/

Friday, 10 January 2014

China to overtake U.S. as world’s top trader

China is poised to become the world’s top trading nation, a position long held by the United States.


China reported Friday that its total trade for 2013 reached $4.2 trillion, a sharp increase over the previous year. It is the first time the world’s most populous country has cleared the $4 trillion barrier, a feat accomplished despite lackluster numbers for the final month of the year.


Read Full Article HERE






Charles Riley and Fing Ke, CNN Money via CHINA US Focus http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ChinaUsFocus/~3/9CDHWuja4Kk/

China fires back at U.S. for criticism on fishing curbs

China defended on Friday its new fishing restrictions in disputed waters in the South China Sea against criticism from the United States, saying the rules were in accordance with international law.


The rules, approved by China’s southern Hainan province, took effect on January 1 and require foreign fishing vessels to obtain approval to enter the waters, which the local government says are under its jurisdiction.


Read Full Article HERE






Megha Rajagopalan, Reuters via CHINA US Focus http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ChinaUsFocus/~3/tKT52-V0Ii0/

China Disciplines 48 for Pipeline Explosions in Qingdao

China disciplined 48 people, including the chairman of China’s largest refining company, for pipeline explosions that ripped through the city of Qingdao in November, killing 62 and leaving 136 more injured.


The State Council, or China’s cabinet, also said an additional 15 people would be handed over to investigators for prosecution for the deadly blasts, the official Xinhua news agency reported. It didn’t identify the 15 people.


Read Full Article HERE






Wayne Ma, Wall Street Journal via CHINA US Focus http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ChinaUsFocus/~3/zwHo10-wBfQ/

Even as Wages Rise, China Exports Grow

Cheng Chunmeng, the general manager of a manufacturer of colorful children’s chairs in east-central China, gave his workers a 30 percent raise last year to keep them from leaving. His labor costs are rising even faster in dollar terms, as the Chinese currency slowly climbs against the United States dollar.


Yet Mr. Cheng, like many Chinese exporters, enjoys growing sales to the United States. “I saw a remarkable increase in orders from the United States starting in March, and getting better and better since then,” Mr. Cheng said. “I feel 2014 will be an even better year.”


Read Full Article HERE






Keith Bradsher, New York Times via CHINA US Focus http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ChinaUsFocus/~3/KV3X9r2rNyg/

Japan urges ‘hotline’ with China, plays down shrine visit

Japan, at odds with China on territorial and other issues, took its case to Europe on Thursday, defending Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s visit to a war shrine and reiterating its call for an emergency hotline between Tokyo and Beijing.


Ties between the two Asian economic giants, never warm, were further strained last month when Abe visited Tokyo’s Yasukuni Shrine, where Japanese leaders convicted as war criminals are enshrined with other war dead, angering China and South Korea.


Read Full Article HERE






John Irish, Reuters via CHINA US Focus http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ChinaUsFocus/~3/SsnD8hkUHl0/